Text only

skip VC's Office | University | Search | News | A-Z Index | Contact VC's Office 

-
Sulis soft

Executive Committee

  University of Bath logo - links to University home page

Summary notes of the Executive Committee held on 15 December 2004

  1. Director of IT

    The Pro-Vice-Chancellor (Research) had agreed to assume responsibility for management and oversight of UKOLN. This had been discussed with the Director of UKOLN, who was happy with the arrangement. The Vice-Chancellor reiterated her appreciation of the contribution made to the University by the Director of IT during his period of office.

  1. Higher Education Funding 2005-06 to 2007-08: Grant letter from the Secretary of State for Education and Skills to the HEFCE

    The Vice-Chancellor highlighted the key points of this letter:

  • Government expenditure on HE would increase by over £2 billion between 2004/05 and 2007/08, taking total investment to over £9.5 billion. This represented an increase of some 11 percent in real terms.
  • Recurrent funding for research would increase by 30 percent over the same period, from £1.3 billion to £1.7 billion.
  • Recurrent funding for teaching would increase by a total of £672 million, permitting a year-on-year increase in funded student places (33,000, 25,000 and 24,000 staggered over the three-year period), whilst maintaining the unit of resource in real terms. The statement that the HEFCE should "…fund more foundation degrees, while striking a balance between the development of lifelong learning networks and the need for higher education places of individual regions…" indicated that projects which aimed to expand HE provision in a number of regions were being given serious consideration by government. At the same time, significant concern had been registered about the growth in unfunded student places; it was made clear that any over-recruitment could result in transfer of elements of the HEFCE grant back to the DfES, in order to meet the additional student support costs.

For the sector as a whole, the grant letter appeared to set a framework of growth with a strong regional imperative in geographical areas of under-provision, whilst maintaining the unit of resource. As far as the University was concerned, the growth in funded places might help to cover the costs of the 300 places that were currently being supported on an unfunded basis, and should enable the embedding of lifelong learning networks in Swindon. In terms of research, an increase in QR funding might help to compensate for the deficit resulting from over-trading, and possibly allow for some expansion of the RC portfolio.

  1. Administrative and Process Review

    The Registrar reported that Southern Universities Management Services (SUMS) were now drawing up the terms of reference for a process review that would consider student record-keeping across all departments. This would cover the full range of activity from recruitment and admission, through to progression and final examination and graduation. A presentation on the project, together with the general services offered by SUMS, had been scheduled for the Heads of Department meeting of 24 January 2005. Additional briefings would be arranged for all those staff who were likely to be involved, and general information on the underlying purpose of the project would be disseminated to the wider University community.

  2. Child Protection Policy

    The Director of Sports Development and Recreation presented a draft policy that aimed to safeguard the welfare of all children taking part in all activities organised under the auspices of his department. Various guidelines and policies were in operation at present, but these were largely of an ad hoc nature. It was now thought that the large increase in the number of children participating in activities resulting from the opening of the STV, together with the changing legislative environment, necessitated the formulation of a single, comprehensive policy for the Department of Sports Development and Recreation (DSDR) as a whole. The draft put forward sought to do this on the basis of a number of key principles, namely that:

  • The welfare of the child was paramount (where a child is defined as a person aged under 18 years, in accordance with The Children Act 1989);
  • All children, whatever their age, culture, disability, gender, language, racial origin, religious beliefs and/or sexual identity had the right to protection from abuse;
  • All suspicions and allegations of abuse would be taken seriously, with a swift and appropriate response;
  • All persons working in the DSDR had a responsibility to report concerns to their line manager or some other appropriate person.

The DSDR had consulted widely in preparation of the draft policy, externally with national coaching and governing bodies and internally with the Registrar's Office and Department of Human Resources. The University Legal Advisor was reportedly content with the draft. Subject to approval, the policy would be promulgated within the DSDR, and form the basis of a rolling programme of education and training.

The Registrar believed that the draft policy had addressed the specific issues faced by the DSDR in a comprehensive fashion and provided a good starting point for wider consideration of similar matters across the University. Parallel work was already underway to consider the legal implications of the University regulation that permitted the admission of students under the age of 18 years, and preliminary discussions had taken place about the need for a more co-ordinated institutional position on child protection, covering sport and the nursery, but also extending to other activities, such as SU/ University widening participation events.

Agreed:
(i) That the draft policy could be approved for immediate adoption and implementation within the Department of Sports Development and Recreation.
(ii) That the Registrar would take forward formulation of a University policy, to be informed by the DSDR policy.

Top of page

  1. Quarterly Updates

    (a) Capital Projects

    The Director of Estates highlighted the following projects:

    Projects currently on site

  • 3 West North: Work was progressing well, with handover scheduled for 30 April 2005
  • 4 West: Asbestos removal and machine demolition work was now at a critical stage, with completion date still fixed for early May 2005. A design team for the replacement building had started work on initial ideas for the redevelopment of the greater 4 West site.
  • Project Capital Round 3 (DDA): This large package of works, affecting both the residential and non-residential estate, was intended to improve access for the disabled. Particular attention would be paid to signage across the campus, which was generally regarded as poor. The Estates Department was working with the Department of Marketing and Communications to produce a signage template and manual. Allies and Morrison would be involved in this as well.
  • Sports Training Café: Design work had been completed and the project had gone out to tender with a budget of up to £343,000 (including VAT).
  • 5 West Level 1: A design team were working on a study to consider the feasibility of refurbishing and extending this facility. Their report was almost complete and would inform subsequent investment decision-making.

The Committee noted the report.

The Vice-Chancellor inquired whether project contingencies had been set at levels that were sufficient to satisfy the strong policy steer recently provided by the Buildings Committee. The Director of Estates confirmed that this was so, stating that contingencies of 10 percent and 5 percent had been set for the 4 West and Project Capital Round 3 schemes, respectively.

(b) Research and Innovation Services (RIS)

The Director of Research and Innovation Services highlighted the following points:

  • RIS was formed on 1 August 2004 by bringing together existing services in Knowledge Transfer Services and the Grants and Contracts Unit, together with a remodelled version of Faculty Research and Business Development activity.
  • Research and Innovation Development: A Research and Innovation Manager had been appointed for the Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences; similar appointments would be made in the New Year in respect of Life Sciences and Health and Engineering and Physical Sciences.
  • Research Support Unit (formerly the Grants and Contracts Unit): This continued to be lined-managed by the Director of Finance, but improved links to RIS were being developed.
  • Enterprise Education Development: Progress had been made on a wide range of projects, including the first award from the Enterprise Education Venture Fund.
  • Knowledge Transfer Partnerships and Consultancy: In addition to the continuation of existing projects and the development of potential new projects, the Head of Knowledge Transfer Partnerships and Consultancy was assuming a cross-institutional leadership role in respect of the three HEIF2 partners. A Consultancy Support Manager was to be recruited.
  • IP and Commercialization: An expanded team led by the Head of Intellectual Property Services was increasing legal support for a growing portfolio of IP exploitation projects, including 2 or 3 incipient spin-offs.
  • Innovation Centres: Given that Carpenter House was fully occupied and the Swindon Innovation Centre 60 percent occupied, the emphasis was now on the acceleration of development of young enterprises and the encouragement of greater interaction with the academic expertise of the University.
  • Marketing and Networks: A number of projects were underway, including a review of the InterACTIVE Network, regional promotion of University expertise in the engineering and environmental sectors, SWRDA-funded project support for an Inspire SW Aerospace Panel, development of a RIS website, and implementation of an RIS communications plan.
  • These activities were underpinned by an extensive range of performance measures and targets.

The Pro-Vice-Chancellor (Research) commented that he chaired the Research and Innovation Services Steering Group. In view of the increasing scale of RIS operations, the Vice-Chancellor suggested that some thought be given to expanding this Group, possibly to include external representation.

  1. Arts Committee: proposal for one additrional member

    Agreed: That, in order to strengthened links between the two bodies, the membership of the Arts Committee should be amended to convert the co-opted position of Senior Common Room (Works of Art Liaison) representative into an ex-officio position.

  2. Oakfield Executive Group: Membership and Terms of Reference

    Agreed: That the membership and terms of reference presented to the Executive Committee could be approved.

  3. The following items were received without comment:

Notes of the Faculty of Engineering and Design Executive Committee
(a) 22 June 2004
(b) 28 September 2004
(c) 26 October 2004

Notes of the Faculty of Science Executive: 2 November 2004

Notes of the Faculty of Humanities and Social Science Heads of Department Committee: 15 November 2004

Notes of the University Research Committee
(a) 27 September 2004
(b) 3 November 2004
(c) 1 December 2004

Notes of the Student Experience and Strategy Committee: 1 November 2004

Notes of the Oakfield Executive Group: 24 November 2004

Notes of the Arts Committee: 16 November 2004

Notes of the Transport Strategy Consultative Working Group: 22 July 2004

Notes of the Transparent Approach to Costing Steering Group
(a) 17 August 2004
(b) 13 September 2004
(c) 18 October 2004

Notes of the Integrated Institute for Industrial Integration Group
(a) 19 August 2004
(b) 10 September 2004
(c) 6 October 2004

Top of page