Text only

skip VC's Office | University | Search | News | A-Z Index | Contact VC's Office 

-
Sulis soft

Executive Committee

  University of Bath logo - links to University home page

Summary notes of the Executive Committee held on 16 February 2005

  1. HEFCE Capital Funding for Learning and Teaching

    The HEFCE had recently announced details of its next round of capital funding for research and learning and teaching. The University's allocations were as follows:

    Nature of Capital Investment

    Allocation (£)

    Research Infrastructure
    10,336,968
    Franchised Student Infrastructure
    241,414
    Learning and Teaching Infrastructure
    4,022,850

    The University had to contribute 10 percent matched funding at the programme level.

  1. Strategic Investment

    The Deputy Vice-Chancellor said that proposals for strategic investment put before the Committee had been collated from those arising in the Annual Planning Cycle and those made directly by the Deans and Acting Head of School. As might be expected, their combined value exceeded the sum currently available for investment. It was therefore suggested that the following five priority areas be earmarked for investment:

  • Support to help departments prepare for the RAE 2008, or other defined, small-scale tactical purpose, by means of relief from teaching and administrative duties and similar measures.
  • Leverage funding to secure large-scale research grants.
  • Enhancement of funding for the Library and Learning Centre, as the critical academic support service.
  • Support for replacement and new posts, and for packages for early retirement, in areas of strength, to be defined using criteria of performance in the RAE 2001 and student recruitment.
  • Support for initiatives that promote innovation and income generation within the University over the longer term.

This proposal followed a strategy of investing in areas of proven excellence and creating capacity for excellence in new areas. Investment would be tied to a clear commitment to deliver an identifiable benefit or return that could be monitored, an example being assessment of potential RAE impact.

Agreed:
(i) That the priority areas for investment could be approved.
(ii) That the Deputy Vice-Chancellor and Director of Finance would prepare a summary of the individual and combined financial commitments arising from these proposed investments, for circulation to Deans and the Acting Head of School.
(iii) That, in addition, funds would be released to supplement non-pay budgets in recognition of those Faculties which had met their income and savings targets.
(iv) That the funding available under HEFCE Project Capital round 4 should, as far as possible, be invested in infrastructure needs, such as the Library and Learning Centre, Estates and BUCs, that served academic priorities.

  1. Report on the Teaching Efficiencies Working Group

    The Pro-Vice-Chancellor (Learning and Teaching) introduced this report. The remit of the Working Group had been to consider the potential scope for efficiency savings whilst maintaining, and where possible enhancing, the high quality of teaching offered within the University. On the basis of a thorough review of current practice, a large number of recommendations were now put forward covering an extensive range of issues related to teaching and learning (SAMIS and assessment, e-learning, computer-aided assessment, general support, staff development, placement support, quality assurance, administration of academic programmes, generic units and regional collaborations). Action on some of the recommendations was already in hand, such as the proposal to establish the Learning and Teaching Enhancement Office, and in other areas had been overtaken by events, for example the review of placements undertaken by the Fees and Bursaries Working Group. Further thought would be given as to the relative benefits of taking forward each of the remaining recommendations, according to the different timeframes specified. This presented a significant teaching and learning agenda for the next three years or so.

    The Vice-Chancellor thanked the Pro-Vice-Chancellor (Learning and Teaching), and all those who had worked on producing the report. It offered a way of transforming teaching and learning within the University, whilst preserving quality and standards.

    Agreed: That the report could be endorsed. Implementation of recommendations would be reviewed in twelve months' time (February 2006).

Top of page

  1. Establishment of a Learning and Teaching Enhancement Office

    The Pro-Vice-Chancellor (Learning and Teaching) said that this proposal arose out of the recommendation to improve general support for teaching and learning. In common with similar units at other HEIs, the Learning and Teaching Enhancement Office (LTEO) would aim to provide more tailored support for academic departments by integrating related activity in quality assurance, staff development and e-learning. Within the framework of the University's Learning and Teaching Strategy, the LTEO would therefore research and disseminate good practice, co-ordinate the professional development of new academic staff, lead on the development of policy, and assure and enhance the quality of learning and teaching. The organizational structure proposed sought to put traditional quality support activities into a more positive framework, and should help the University to be more successful in tapping into the various learning and teaching funding streams that were now available. Earmarked funding amounting to £150K was available from the HEFCE in the period 2004-2006, to assist in covering transition costs.

    The Registrar gave his full support to the proposal. The Committee noted that it would be crucial for academic departments to feel that they had ownership of the agenda to be taken forward by the LTEO.

    Agreed: That the proposal to establish a Learning and Teaching Enhancement Office could be approved.

  1. Quarterly Update on Research and Innovation Services

    The Director of Research and Innovation Services updated the Committee on the activities of his department over the last quarter. These came under three general headings: collaboration, people and performance.

    Collaboration: In addition to delivering ongoing services, RIS staff (and staff from DfLL) have been actively collaborating with their colleagues from Bristol, Southampton and Surrey in 7/8 theme groups. This degree of collaboration in the area of KT was unprecedented in the HE sector. It should provide scope for the further development of the services offered to University researchers, and better position the University to capitalize on external funding streams.

    People: Progress has been made in recruiting staff funded under HEIF2. Two additional research and innovation managers would be starting soon, and, together with the existing member of staff, would form the Research and Innovation Development team. They would be working with academic departments to develop and market projects.

    Performance: while RIS was still not yet fully resourced, it was thought that, in overall terms, the department was making good progress towards meeting HEIF 2 and other performance targets.

    The Committee noted the report.

    Agreed:
    (i) That, henceforth, abridged reports should also be submitted to Council on a regular basis. The Director of Research and Innovation Services would make a presentation to Council on the work of his department on the next opportune occasion.
    (ii) That a note on the full range of business-related activities undertaken at the Oakfield Campus should be appended to future reports.

  1. The following items were received without comment:

    Notes of the Faculty of Engineering and Design Executive Committee: 30 November 2004

    Notes of the Faculty of Science Executive: 11 January 2005

    Notes of the Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences Heads of Department Committee:
    17 January 2005

    Notes of the 5WL1 Management Committee: 18 January 2005

    Notes of the Space Management Committee: 13 January 2005

    Notes of the Oakfield Executive Group: 26 January 2005

    Notes of the Equal Opportunities Advisory Committee: 20 January 2005

    Notes of the TRAC Steering Group: 8 December 2004

    Notes of the Transport Strategy Consultative Working Group: 8 October 2004

    Notes of the Institute for Integrated Industrial Innovation: 1 November 2004

Top of page