Text only

skip VC's Office | University | Search | News | A-Z Index | Contact VC's Office 

-
Sulis soft

Executive Committee Notes Summary

  University of Bath logo - links to University home page

Summary Notes of the meeting of the Executive Committee held on 27 October

  1. Institutional Audit

    The Pro-Vice-Chancellor (Learning and Teaching) gave an oral report on the Institutional Audit. Informal feedback from the auditors indicated that they would be recommending 'broad confidence' (the highest level of assessment conferred) in the quality of University programmes and the academic standards of our awards. The Quality Assurance Agency would be sending a letter outlining the key preliminary findings of the draft report very shortly. The report itself would then follow in the week beginning 15 December. The Learning and Teaching Committee and the Quality Assurance Committee would consider the comments and recommendations made in the report.

    On behalf of the Committee, the Vice-Chancellor thanked the Pro-Vice-Chancellor (Learning and Teaching), the Senior Assistant Registrar (Quality and Development), and all the staff in the Quality Support Office, for their hard work and considerable contribution in achieving this result.

  1. Student Learning Space at the Claverton Campus

    This discussion paper from the Librarian prompted a wide-ranging debate about teaching and social space. The following key points emerged.

  • Conversion of the front of the Library and Learning Centre into a Cyber Café would be expensive and culturally difficult. A one-stop shop for student services, combined with a general reception, might be a better use of the same space.
  • Creation of the 2 East PC Teaching Laboratory would offer a more conducive facility for IT teaching and learning than the PC areas in Library and Learning Centre, and therefore should help to reduce the student demand on the latter.
  • The introduction of a wireless network in the central areas of the campus could also be expected to reduce the pressure on the Library and Learning Centre, particularly in respect of casual personal use, and open up opportunities for students to use laptops in a wider range of areas, most especially Choices restaurant - a large space that was under-utilised for significant parts of the day. Care would, however, need to be taken to ensure that a wireless network could function properly in the buildings forming the Parade, and for the network to incorporate all existing similar systems.
  • The temptation to cut back on social space should be avoided wherever possible, as this is where a great deal of 'peer learning' took place, an important part of the student experience.
  • Ensuring that there was sufficient GTA space across the University should remain the top priority.

The Committee noted that an audit of space was already underway. This would identify spaces that might potentially be used for teaching and social purposes, and should enable the more efficient management and control of such space.

Agreed: That the Space Committee should be asked to submit a paper to the February meeting of the Executive Committee summarising the results of the space audit and providing a 'roadmap' or plan of space usage across the entire University over the next 12 months.

  1. Review of Trading

    The Deputy Vice-Chancellor took the opportunity to update the Committee on the review of trading services (i.e. catering, bars and retail). Discussions between representatives of the University and the Students' Union were continuing on the creation of a partnership that would yield benefits in terms of more integrated and coherent management, more effective use of resources, and economies of scale in purchasing, while, at the same time, preserving the autonomy of the core activities of the Students' Union.

    The Committee noted that the review extended to services currently offered, or which would be offered, in sporting facilities and the Sullis Club. Scrutiny of business processes would include feedback mechanisms for customers and quality of service in terms of hygiene.

  2. Staff Vacancies Review Group of 24 October 2003

    Agreed: That the recommendations of the Staff Vacancies Review Group could be approved. It was noted that applications for replacement posts should be reviewed on the basis of whether or not they were justified, rather than as a straightforward replacement.

    Posts approved:
    Research Councils Administrator, Finance Office, replacement and revised post, 0.5 to 1.0 fte and Cl3 to Cl4
    PA to Director (Cl5) 0.5 fte, new post, School for Health
    Technician (TC13/14), 1.0 fte, replacement post, School of Management
    Staff Development Officer (AR3), 1.0 fte, replacement post, Department of Human Resources

    Post approved in principle, subject to clarification:
    Technology Transfer Executive (AR3), 1.0 fte, new post, Department of Knowledge Transfer Services

The following items were noted without comment.

  1. Sports Training Village Project Control Group: 19 September 2003
  2. Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Heads of Department Committee: 2 June 2003

MSD
09.12.03

Top of page