Professor Timo Kivimäki
Professor of International Relations and Director of Research
Director of Research
Professor in International RelationsPhD
1 West North 2.39
Professor Kivimäki joined the department in January 2015. Previously he has held professorships at the University of Helsinki, University of Lapland, and at the University of Copenhagen. Professor Kivimäki has also been director of the Nordic Institute of Asian Studies (Copenhagen) and the Institute of Development Studies of the University of Helsinki.
In addition to purely academic work Professor Kivimäki has been a frequent consultant to the Finnish, Danish, Dutch, Russian, Malaysian, Indonesian and Swedish governments, as well as to several UN and EU organizations on conflict and terrorism.
In his forthcoming book Paradigms of Peace (London: Imperial College Press) Timo Kivimäki assesses the contribution of various social scientific paradigms to peace research and peace and sets an agenda for constructivist pragmatist peace research. Professor Kivimäki’s previous book, The Long Peace of East Asia (Farnham: Ashgate, 2014) offers a constructivist explanation to the relative peace of East Asia since 1979. Kivimäki’s book, Can Peace Research Make Peace. Lessons in Academic Diplomacy (Farnham: Ashgate, 2012), was nominated for the prestigious Best Book Prize by the Conflict Research Society in year 2014. Kivimäki’s recent articles on peace and conflict topics were published in the Chinese Journal of International Relations, Pacific Focus, the Pacific Review, International Relations of the Asia Pacific, Journal of Peace Research, Asian Security and the Middle East Policy.
- Peace and Conflict Studies
- pragmatist meta-theory in peace research
- the long peace of East Asia since 1979
- critical theory
- East Asia.
- Paradigms of Peace, A Pragmatist Introduction to the Contribution to Peace of Paradigms of Social Science
- The Long History of Conflicts
- Prospects of Peace in Korea
Kivimaki, T., 2016. Legalism, Developmentalism and Securitization:The Case of Territorial Disputes in the South China Sea. In: Fels, E. and Vu, T.-M., eds. Power Politics in Asia’s Contested Waters. Springer, pp. 57-76.
Kivimaki, T., 2016. Politics of economic relations between China and Myanmar. In: Kim, Y.-C., ed. Chinese Global Production Networks in ASEAN 2016. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing AG, pp. 137-155. (Understanding China)
Kivimaki, T., 2015. Regional Cooperation and Joint Development: Speech That Acts And Action That Speaks”, in , eds., Ashgate, Farnham, 2014.:Speech That Acts And Action That Speaks. In: Wu, S. and Zou, K., eds. Non-Traditional Security Issues and the South China Sea:. Farnham: Ashgate, pp. 17-31. (Contemporary Issues in the South China Sea)
Kivimaki, T., 2016. Social Constructs, Material Realities and the Opportunity of Legal Solutions in the South China Sea. Journal of Political Risk, 4 (3).
Kivimaki, T., 2015. Will air raids in Syria help enforce terror-free global order? International Policy Digest
Kivimaki, T., 2015. People's Daily and the reality of South China Sea territorial disputes. Asian Politics and Policy, 7 (2), 319–323.
Kivimaki, T., 2015. Finlandization and the peaceful development of China. Chinese Journal of International Politics, 8 (2), pp. 139-166.
Kivimaki, T., 2015. Constructivist pragmatism and academic diplomacy for conflict resolution. International Journal of Political Science & Diplomacy, 1 (102), pp. 1-7.
Kivimaki, T., 2015. How does the norm on non-interference affect peace in East Asia? Asian Survey, 55 (6).
Kivimaki, T., 2014. Soft Power and Global Governance with Chinese Characteristics. Chinese Journal of International Politics, 7 (4), pp. 421-447.
Kivimaki, T., 2014. Can the Pragmatic East Asian Approach to Human Security Offer a Way for the Deepening of the Long Peace of East Asia? Journal of Human Security, 10 (1), pp. 76-88.
Kivimaki, T., 2014. Practical and Impractical Knowledge about the Conflict in Ukraine. E-International Relations, 2014.
Kivimaki, T. A., 2015. Kim Jong-un is not the only obstruction to peace in Korea. The Conversation