Scientists penalised by motherhood, shows research
Female academics with young children find it more difficult to access research funding and generate attention for their results than their male counterparts, according to a new study presented at the Royal Economic Society’s Annual Conference (28 March 2018).
Analysing the careers of 262 male and female scientists at the University of Turin over a ten-year period, the study shows that women receive less funding than their male peers and citation rates, where research is quoted in other academic work, drop for women with young children. The study examined teaching and family commitments alongside public funding and the impact of research achieved through the quality of journal publications and volume of citations.
Researchers from the Universities of Bath, Turin and the National Research Council of Italy found that public funding of research is controlled by elite networks, such as professional scientific bodies, with those in leading management roles receiving twice the funding of other academics, through favouritism or unconscious bias in the selection process.
Dr Cornelia Lawson, from the University's School of Management, said: “Our research shows that female scientists with young children are not matching the citation levels of their male counterparts. It may be that the challenge of travel to international conferences and meetings to promote research findings alongside childcare responsibility is at the heart of the motherhood penalty, leaving quality research overlooked. It highlights the need for support systems for women with childcare responsibilities.
“Conversely, fatherhood is correlated with higher citation rates for male scientists in the study, driven perhaps by the desire to provide for their new offspring, or reflecting a strategic decision to have a family when they feel their career is safely established.”
The researchers believe that their research has applications across a range of academic disciplines and to countries including the UK, China and the United States, where the allocation of research funding is also linked to management of elite networks.
Professor Aldo Geuna, from the University of Turin, said: “The strong influence of management positions in professional societies on research funding is concerning. Other networks should be given the same opportunity for funding and greater scrutiny of selection processes and diversity on selection processes is crucial.
“The productivity puzzle is an important question for Universities that are striving to further scientific and technical knowledge and we hope that Universities will do more to address the obstacles faced by female academics with young children.”
The researchers point to training initiated by the European Research Council and the Research Councils UK (RCUK) to address unconscious bias in funding allocation, and the Athena SWAN Charter to advance gender equality in academia, as positive measures that they hope will help to overcome the hurdles identified in their research.
The Funding-Productivity Nexus in Science: Family and Other Sources of Endogeneity is available online at