Skip to main content

Latest Centre Publications

An overview of the most recent papers and reports produced by members of the Centre for 21st Century Public Health.

Developing Guidance on Assessing and Managing Conflicts on Interest for a Complex Public Health Research Consortium

This paper was authored by Dr Amber van den Akker, Dr Alice Fabbri and Professor Anna Gilmore and colleagues from the LHGP Research Consortium, and published in the journal of Research Management and Administration.


Black and white of laptops at a table and individual taking notes

The paper examines how conflicts of interest (COIs) in public health research are often inadequately addressed through disclosure alone and describes the development of a more robust COI policy for a large, multi‑institutional research consortium. Using a reflective case study approach, the authors document the practical steps, challenges, and considerations involved in creating and implementing this policy within a project focused on the commercial determinants of health. The paper offers actionable guidance to strengthen research governance and better safeguard the integrity of collaborative public health research

The Lancet Commission on improving population health post-COVID-19

Professor Harry Rutter co-chaired this Commission published in The Lancet.


From above, people walking on the street

This Commission identifies that three interconnected global threats, non-communicable diseases, infectious disease outbreaks, and environmental degradation, continue to worsen despite international commitments. These threats share underlying drivers rooted in political and economic systems that prioritise growth over health and sustainability, disproportionately harming people in low-income settings. To address this, authors examined the physical environment and transport, agriculture and food, and energy systems, developing ten objectives and evidence‑based recommendations through reviews, expert input, and economic modelling. Their findings highlight how intertwined factors, such as land clearing for palm oil, unhealthy diets, ecosystem destruction, and climate change, simultaneously fuel disease and environmental crises. The Commission emphasises that meaningful progress requires transforming the environments that shape population behaviour, rather than relying on individual choice, and calls for governments and businesses to take systemic action. Their priority recommendations focus on replacing harmful policies, strengthening institutions and civil society, and building capacity for integrated responses, with measurable progress needed by 2030.

Safeguarding governance and advancing policy at the nexus of climate and health: a commercial determinants of health perspective

Authored by PhD student Dan Hunt and Dr Britta Matthes, this paper was published in the Journal of Climate Change and Health


Black and white image of protest with people holding large signs on climate action and health

Climate change is weakening the political, economic, social, and technological systems needed for effective health governance, forcing governments to divert resources toward emergency responses and creating vulnerabilities that commercial actors can exploit. Dan Hunt and Dr Britta Matthes highlight that this destabilisation enables corporate influence over health policy, particularly as climate driven economic insecurity affects GDP, employment, and supply chains. The paper reveals how some commercial actors take advantage of these conditions—for example through casualised labour or raising prices for essential medicines during crises—and notes that over 70% of post industrial CO₂ emissions originate from just 78 corporate and state entities. It also emphasises the longstanding denial and delay strategies used by fossil fuel, plastics, and agrichemical industries to obstruct climate policy.

Flue-cured tobacco in Zimbabwe: a particularly harmful commodity requiring the attention of tobacco control

Authored by Dr Rosemary Hiscock, Dr Britta Matthes and Dr Michael Bloomfield, this paper was published in the British Medical Journal.


Black and white image of drying tobacco leaves

New research by the University of Bath’s Tobacco Control Research Group reveals that flue cured Virginia tobacco production in Zimbabwe causes severe environmental and economic harm, including the annual destruction of around 60,000 hectares of Miombo woodland and economic conditions that trap smallholder farmers in dependence on tobacco companies. The study explains that farmers rely on contracts that provide loans for agrochemicals but limit them to selling only to the contracting company, which controls prices and keeps earnings too low for farmers to protect woodlands or diversify into other crops. The curing process itself requires large amounts of wood fuel and contributes to climate change, while tobacco companies promote an image of sustainability that does not reflect the reality experienced by farmers.

Talking to your child about weight

A guide and videos for parents and caregivers, developed from research led by Professor Fiona Gillison, supporting sensitive conversations with children about their weight.


Image of step on weighing scales

Researchers at the University of Bath have produced a series of short, evidence based films to help parents navigate sensitive conversations with children about weight, offering practical strategies drawn from lived experiences. The videos build on a written guide led by Professor Fiona Gillison and created with input from parents, healthcare professionals, charities, and academics, forming the first evidence based resources designed for both parents and clinicians. These materials aim to reduce parents’ fear of causing harm, provide clear guidance on when and how to talk about weight, and support children who may be worried about their weight or experiencing bullying. Clinicians involved highlight the importance of sensitive, skilful conversations to avoid shame while ensuring children receive support.

No change in illicit tobacco use following the introduction of standardised packaging? A longitudinal online survey in the United Kingdom

Authored by Dr Daniel Jones and academics from the University of Stirling, this paper was published in Tobacco Use Insights.


Hand outstretched with open packet of cigarettes

This paper investigates whether the introduction of standardised tobacco packaging in the UK led to an increase in illicit tobacco use, as the tobacco industry has long claimed. Using four waves of data from a longitudinal online survey (one wave before standardised packaging in 2016 and three after in 2017, 2019, and 2022), the study finds no evidence of increased illicit tobacco purchasing following the policy change. In fact, reports of buying illicit cigarettes or roll your own tobacco were slightly lower in 2019 and 2022 compared with 2016. Among those who did use illicit products, key reasons included low cost, high availability, and opportunism, while very few cited attractive packaging as a motivating factor either before or after the shift to standardised packs.