24 November 2026
Politicised Scientists, Retractions and Media - Dr Eleonora Alabrese
We study the reputational cost of scientists' political expression on social media. Twitter data on 98,000 U.S. academics (2016--2022) reveal substantial engagement with politically salient issues, although most posts take no political stance. Experiments with 6,000 U.S. respondents and 135 journalists show that scientists who express political views are rated less credible than politically silent ones, with penalties increasing in the strength of expression and concentrated among ideologically opposed audiences. Both politically salient research content and explicit identity cues trigger these penalties. Surveyed scientists anticipate the penalty---indeed overestimate it---and endorse limiting political expression to their domain of expertise.
Eleonora is a lecturer at the Department of Economics working on empirical political economy and the Economics of Science. Her research focuses on misinformation, the role of media and its relationship with science and science communication. Some of her current working papers investigate retractions in science and media coverage, and AI.