Summary
As part my research project, I pre-registered a systematic mapping review using the Open Science Framework (OSF). This pre-registration allowed me to plan my research in detail, outlining methodological steps and anticipating potential challenges. Documenting my methodology in advance also set a foundation for sharing additional materials—such as search terms, R code, and results—upon final publication, promoting transparency and reproducibility.
Context
The aim of this study was to map the state of the existing literature in a particular topic, summarising trends and to identify gaps of an underexplored area. Specifically, it examines the relationship between a non-pharmaceutical approach to health, known as social prescribing, and patterns of medication prescription and use.
My data consists of a broad range of literature, systematically collected using predetermined search terms and inclusion/exclusion criteria. The methods involved carefully defining the scope, selecting appropriate literature, and coding data to identify patterns and gaps across the literature.
This pre-registration was originally undertaken to ensure transparency and reproducibility of the review and because it is increasingly becoming an expectation in my field. However, beyond that, I found it particularly helpful in planning and setting out all the steps to be undertaken.
Reflections
Given the exploratory nature of my mapping review, using pre-registration initially raised some uncertainty as to how to proceed. However, open research practices aren’t solely for hypothesis-driven research, and I found pre-registration to be a valuable tool. It enabled me to concretely lay out my research plans including my research questions, the detailed search strategy, and how I would present the results, all before running the search. This preparation helped avoid missed steps down the line, facilitated by gaining critical early feedback and raising potential challenges to be considered.
Using the Open Science Framework (OSF) to pre-register my study offered flexibility, allowing me to define key elements while leaving room for adjustments during the review process. Although pre-registration required an upfront time investment, it ultimately saved time as everything was thought through a priori. It also served as a foundation for drafting the manuscript and organising materials, facilitating future open research practices like sharing data and materials. Upon publication, I plan to share search terms, queries, results, R code, and more, creating a comprehensive resource for other researchers. Based on my experience, I know how helpful it is to see in detail how others’ work was conducted to inform future projects.
The Psychology Open Research Group has been incredibly helpful in sharing both knowledge and practical tips, from broad open research practices to the finer details of uploading information on platforms like OSF. I also consulted OSF templates and previous pre-registrations from other researchers to understand best practices, what to include, and how to plan for the entire process.
Take-home message
Pre-registering my mapping review on OSF not only enhanced the transparency of my research but significantly contributed to its structure as well. Although it required upfront effort, it helped streamline the process and set the stage for sharing all materials, benefiting both myself and hopefully other researchers in the field.
About the author
I am a PhD student based in the Department of Psychology currently investigating a non-pharmaceutical approach aimed at enhancing health and wellbeing. With a background in health psychology, my research interests include complex health interventions, healthcare systems and medicine prescription; social determinants of health; community-centred solutions; loneliness and social connection; and a whole systems approach.
Links
The pre-registration for this systematic mapping review can be found on the OSF: