The Aristotelian notion of phronesis, or practical wisdom, is often considered integral to responsible management education. After all, what it means to be responsible is closely related to the specific social context in which individuals find themselves.
The rapid proliferation of generative AI-based products in management learning and education (MLE) introduces a fundamental challenge to individuals learning to engage in phronesis.
Analysing the relationship between generative AI, synthetic data, digital mediation, and synthetic MLE, we unpack why and how digitally mediated MLE can evolve into its synthetic form, potentially undermining the development of phronesis in so doing.
This seminar forms part of our upcoming DBA HEM Residential, which runs from Monday 10 to Monday 17 February.
Register for the event
All are welcome to attend this event, please sign up using one of the links below.
In-person registration
For attendance to the in-person event, please sign up using this form.
Online registration
For hybrid attendance, please sign up using this form.
Speaker biography
Professor Dirk Lindebaum is curious about 'values' as a meta-theme in his research, particularly in relation to theory-building, learning and education, technology, and emotions at work.
He is Professor in Management and Organisation at the School of Management.
His work regularly appears in internationally renowned journals, such as Academy of Management Review, Journal of Management Studies and Human Relations. He also currently serves as the Editor-in-Chief of Academy of Management Learning and Education.
Further reading
- Lindebaum, D & Fleming, P 2024, 'ChatGPT Undermines Human Reflexivity, Scientific Responsibility and Responsible Management Research', British Journal of Management, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 566-575.
- Lindebaum, D 2024, 'Is Peer Review Ripe for a Revise and Resubmit? – Academics Might Be Less the Party Answering That Question', Business History, vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 802-806.
- Lindebaum, D & Langer, S 2024, 'On the Psycho-Emotional Deficitisation of Workers in the Age of Cognitive Enhancement', Organization, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 703-719.